G4 for Leopad Can’it be?
October 27, 2007
by Thomas Ricker
t’s no surprise to hear that Leopard smokes on the latest Intel box, right? That’s all fine and dandy for new Mac owners but what about the rest of us (the majority) who are still pumping that legacy PowerPC architecture beneath Cupertino’s OS? How does Apple’s OS of tomorrow run onm say, an 8 year old Power Mac G4 (AGP Graphics)? We decided to find out. Our test machine sports a paltry 512MB and 1GHz clock courtesy of an after-market CPU upgrade (was 400MHz) — just a tad better than the 867MHz / 512MB minimum requirement. While the box held up surprisingly well, there’s one major problem which you old-timers should be aware of.
More:Engadget
Waste Your Time for Leopad
October 27, 2007
How Newyork excite for leopad ? check it Why day do like a crazy gamer waitng for new consol, but miss some destroyer like before on PS3
Video by Richard Blakeley
The First LeoPard Os Reviews In WSJ.com
October 25, 2007
While many people waiting to use the awesome leopard but WSJ.com always be the first to test its……
Mossberg WSJ Review: After his headline ("Leopard: Faster, Easier Than Vista") and on a short history tour of Apple as a company, Mossberg moves on to say that while Leopard is good, it’s evolutionary, and not revolutionary—but still manages to keep Apple’s "advantage over Windows". He does have some gripes. He says the menubar is translucent (it’s actually not, in the final version), the icons are "dull and flat and less atractive than Vista’s" (we disagree), Time Machine, although described as "sexy", has limited backup locations. And that none of Apple’s 300 new features are a major breakthrough. However, Leopard doesn’t have any of the upgrade problems (when upgrading from Tiger) that Vista had from XP. Mossberg then goes into feature list mode, but ends by saying that Leopard isn’t a must-have, it just adds a lot of value on an existing machine.[WSJ]
Please Review More: Gismodo.com
